Leo, half amused and angry, the last Gustavo Bueno statements about the withdrawal of crucifritos still hanging from some public schools. Funny because the right believes that stale clerical stooge media is a subject worthy of inclusion in their leaflets, angry because such individual is given the title of "atheist philosopher." Gustavo Bueno
whether or not worthy of the name of philosopher I leave to the discretion of each reader. For me personally its philosophy seems an artificial attempt to revalue the Hegelian idealism with some touches of material taken from Marx. Afterward, baptizes it with the very inappropriate name "philosophical materialism" (as if his was the only one), and selling books and interviews reality shows. Quite painful for the culture at large, but very understandable in a country like Spain legs. Gustavo Bueno
That is an atheist or not is something that even he may not know. However, one thing is certain: paying takes some time to defend religious irrationality and illegitimate economic and social interests of the criminal-Catholic sect . Quite surprising thing an atheist. And this is what bothers me personally. The philosopher of yore seems to have found a vein in the matter of telling him detest atheism atheist. Oriana Fallaci or would have done better, because at least the Oriana was fighting against Islam until the end of his days, but Gustavo Bueno, cowardice, is not able to make critical or "witnesses" of Jehovah.
But, finally, let the philosopher mercenary to focus on controversial crucifixes. Thanks to her, we saw once again the profound immorality of Christian superstition. They start lying Christian clergy as villains: the Valladolid arzobisperro saying that iconographic paraphernalia "is a sign of love," the room mate of filopederasta Rouco, the mendacious Martinez Camino, saying it is "a sign of freedom." What love, what freedom? The symbol of Galilean believers in the calibration has been for more than sixteen centuries the symbol of the most rabid of oppression, the most insulting of hatred. But as the mouth of the "prophet" of Nazareth came just stupidity, it is understandable that their symbols have sprouted but aberrations.
Well, if not enough with these obvious falsehoods peddled by clericuervos, we must see how their level is reduced to dialectical argument ad hominem . Have not you noticed that the parent who filed and won the demand for the withdrawal of crucifixes in school children in Valladolid, was being persecuted fledged? Yes, those moral and the immoral Jewish model hook, think slandering going to get shut up, that threatens to unfortunate claims under Article 525 of the Criminal Code will make your filth go unanswered. I regret to inform you
, geeks / Christians, who never silenciaréis the voice of reason. It hath already condemned.
whether or not worthy of the name of philosopher I leave to the discretion of each reader. For me personally its philosophy seems an artificial attempt to revalue the Hegelian idealism with some touches of material taken from Marx. Afterward, baptizes it with the very inappropriate name "philosophical materialism" (as if his was the only one), and selling books and interviews reality shows. Quite painful for the culture at large, but very understandable in a country like Spain legs. Gustavo Bueno
That is an atheist or not is something that even he may not know. However, one thing is certain: paying takes some time to defend religious irrationality and illegitimate economic and social interests of the criminal-Catholic sect . Quite surprising thing an atheist. And this is what bothers me personally. The philosopher of yore seems to have found a vein in the matter of telling him detest atheism atheist. Oriana Fallaci or would have done better, because at least the Oriana was fighting against Islam until the end of his days, but Gustavo Bueno, cowardice, is not able to make critical or "witnesses" of Jehovah.
But, finally, let the philosopher mercenary to focus on controversial crucifixes. Thanks to her, we saw once again the profound immorality of Christian superstition. They start lying Christian clergy as villains: the Valladolid arzobisperro saying that iconographic paraphernalia "is a sign of love," the room mate of filopederasta Rouco, the mendacious Martinez Camino, saying it is "a sign of freedom." What love, what freedom? The symbol of Galilean believers in the calibration has been for more than sixteen centuries the symbol of the most rabid of oppression, the most insulting of hatred. But as the mouth of the "prophet" of Nazareth came just stupidity, it is understandable that their symbols have sprouted but aberrations.
Well, if not enough with these obvious falsehoods peddled by clericuervos, we must see how their level is reduced to dialectical argument ad hominem . Have not you noticed that the parent who filed and won the demand for the withdrawal of crucifixes in school children in Valladolid, was being persecuted fledged? Yes, those moral and the immoral Jewish model hook, think slandering going to get shut up, that threatens to unfortunate claims under Article 525 of the Criminal Code will make your filth go unanswered. I regret to inform you
, geeks / Christians, who never silenciaréis the voice of reason. It hath already condemned.
